If You’re Going to Vibe Code, Do It in C

If You’re Going to Vibe Code, Do It in C
Eyeglasses reflecting computer code on a monitor, ideal for technology and programming themes.

As more developers experiment with LLM-assisted “vibe coding” - sketching out functionality first and tightening the bolts later - C has a surprisingly pragmatic appeal. What’s notable here isn’t nostalgia; it’s the ABI. Under the hood, C exposes a stable calling convention that most runtimes speak fluently. A quick C shim can be dlopen’d from Python, called via Rust’s extern "C", wrapped through Node’s N-API, or compiled to WASI for sandboxed execution. That makes C an efficient target for AI‑generated prototypes that need to plug into heterogeneous stacks without wrestling bespoke FFI layers.

The bigger picture: constraints help. C’s explicit types and memory model force ambiguities out of LLM output, and the ecosystem has mature guardrails - compile-time warnings, sanitizers (ASan/UBSan), valgrind, and dead-simple fuzzing (libFuzzer/AFL) - to quickly surface undefined behavior. Performance is measurable, the binary is portable, and the ABI can be kept stable even if you later harden internals in Rust or C++ behind the same C interface. Worth noting: you still need discipline on safety (no unchecked pointers, no undefined lifetimes), and C won’t save a sloppy design. But if the goal is to rapidly prototype components that interoperate everywhere and can be productionized incrementally, targeting C is less about vibes and more about choosing the lingua franca of systems.

Subscribe to SmmJournal

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe